Analyze My Writing
What Did I Just Agree To?
Privacy Policies and Readability
After reading an article about online privacy policies and their general incomprehensibility to
the average consumer (Fanguy, Kleen, Soule, 2004),
we thought it might be interesting to run some readability
analyses on some online privacy policies.
The text averages out to a reading level of about 13th grade (college freshman) with the most difficult
passages falling into the 19th grade (see paragraph below).
This is an interesting finding as it is well-noted that the average adult in the U.S. reads at about an
8th grade level
More in line with the methods of Fanguy, Kleen, and Soule,
we also performed a Cloze Test
on a 127 word sample of the policy which we had not read
by removing every 5th word(the average and median
of the Gunning fog, Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, and Automated readability indices
were 19th grade).
The authors of this site scored 48% which falls short of the common standard of 60%
in order to be considered easy reading for a target audience.
We may interpret this result to mean that assuming we are among the target audience of this
statement, that this particular passage is not easy reading for us.
Ok! We're Busted!
we admit that it is no easier to read than the above mentioned. In fact, it's harder!
It clocks in at about 14th grade (2nd year undergraduate).
have high text complexity.
One explanation for this is that in a litigious age one cannot be too careful;
the language must be crafted to cover a very broad spectrum of possibilities.
Is this necessarily a bad thing?
As with almost everything in life, in some ways yes, and in some ways no.
Readers should know what a site's policies are,
and both the user and the site owner should explicitly agree (via some policy) on what
they expect from one another when using the site.
On the other hand though, if such agreements are so complex that its users can't
understand the agreement without the assistance of a legal professional,
and if it's something we just scroll to the end of so we can click the "I agree" button,
then it almost seems pointless doesn't it?
We do try to be as transparent as possible though and we encourage the reader to at least try to read both our
and Terms of Service
The interested reader may analyze both of these by pasting either one the box on our homepage.
As there is no registration to use our site, we don't collect any personally identifiable information
from anyone (including children and adults) such as names, home addresses, credit card information, and so on.
We use Google Analytics and Google AdSense
which respectively use first-party cookies and the DoubleClick DART Cookie
and we tell you where you can opt out of receiving these cookies.
As our visitors are indirect users of the third-party Google software mentioned above,
site users should also be familar with Google's privacy policies and we tell you where you can learn more.
are in line with the conclusions reached by Fanguy, Kleen, and Soule (2008).
The privacy policies we analyzed (ours included)
are arguably difficult reading at best.
So what should we take away from all of this?
We should at the very least ask ourselves some questions.
To whom are we trusting our data? What kinds of data do they collect? Why do they collect it?
What are their policies concerning privacy and the sharing of this data with others?
Are we able to actually read and understand these written policies without assistance?
We can at least speak for ourselves: the data we collect doesn't personally identify any individual,
and we collect it because it is exceedingly helpful in making a better site and
creating a better experience of our users. And we don't share the data with anyone.
terms of service statement of their favorite social networking site, or any other
site with which they share information; our site is no exception.
Links and References
© Analyze My Writing